2006          2005          2004          2003          2002          2001         ARCHIVE


SDT Financial Software Solutions raises expansion capital from the i capital Growth Fund I Pretoria, South Africa.
19 November 2001

The i capital Growth Fund I, a private equity fund managed and controlled by i capital (Pty) Ltd, has acquired 20% of SDT Financial Software Solutions (Pty) Ltd, a specialist developer of retail financial services software solutions based in Pretoria, via a capital injection. The investment, effective 1 September 2001, will allow SDT to further strengthen its position in the South African market for retail financial services software solutions and to expand its existing product suite into other areas of financial services.

SDT Financial Software Solutions develops generic software systems for complex requirements in the retail financial services industry and turns concepts into workable, profitable solutions. The SDT product suite consists of a range of software systems including: SDT Life, a life insurance administration system, SDT GreenKey, a life insurance point-of-sale system; SDT Loans, a loans administration system; SDT Feemanager, a fee and commission management system; and SDT PortfolioManager, an internet based management tool for financial services organisations. SDT's clients include Regent Insurance, Saambou Life, Anchor Life, Saambou Namibia and Thutukani.

"We are very excited to enter the next phase of SDT's growth", says Freda du Toit, executive director of SDT. "i capital brings more than capital to SDT and has in-depth financial and strategic skills, complementing our own product development and marketing capabilities. This combination is crucial if we are to succeed in the fast changing financial services environment," du Toit continues.

i capital is a niche investment company which focuses on private equity fund management and corporate finance advisory services. Through the i capital Growth Fund I, i capital provides growth capital to companies with a high intellectual capital component. SDT Financial Software Solution is the Fund's sixth investment.

"SDT has a strong track record, a growing client base, experienced management and a strong position in its chosen niche markets and is now entering an exciting phase of its development" says Rowan Williams, director of i capital. "SDT recently made a major breakthrough by making its first sale in Australia and expects further expansion into offshore markets," Williams comments. Rowan Williams will be joining the SDT board to provide input on strategic and financial issues.

More information about SDT Financial Software Solutions can be found on www.sdt.co.za, or by sending e-mail to freda@sdt.co.za or telephone (012) 347-4945 Additional information about i capital is available on www.icapital.co.za or by e-mail from rowan.williams@icapital.co.za or telephone 011 784 2230.



i capital backed MIP Holdings ranked 30th in Deloittes Technology Fast 50 Survey
i capital fund managers, Johannesburg, 1 November 2001


With a total turnover growth of 155% over the last 3 years, MIP was recently ranked as one of the fastest growing Technology companies in South Africa by Deloittes in its recent Technology Fast 50 survey. The i capital Growth Fund I, i capital's private equity fund, acquired a 30% interest in MIP in August 1998 via a capital injection to help fund MIP's rapid growth and offshore expansion. The capital was used to develop MIP's highly successful Astra software product and to assist with penetration into offshore markets.

MIP Holdings is an IT solutions house strategically focused on two key operational areas: software application development and open source support tools and services. MIP's software application development division delivers mission-critical business administration systems for the financial services, healthcare, insurance, pension fund and property management industries. MIP's open source support tools and services focus on the delivery of rapid application development tools for e-commerce and web-enablement.

Says Rowan Williams, head of private equity at i capital, "When we originally approached MIP regarding funding using private equity capital, we were very excited by the growth potential for MIP. Our decision to invest has paid off as MIP has effectively utilized the capital injection to accelerate its strong growth and penetrate offshore markets." With a number of offshore clients, a third of MIP's revenues are now hard currency based, and this is expected to increase as offshore sales grow with MIP's recent agreement with Progress Software Corporation. MIP recently achieved a major breakthrough when its Astra framework product was selected over 30 other independent software vendors to form the basis for Nasdaq listed Progress Software Corporation's open source Internet Component Framework. As part of its offshore expansion, MIP recently opened a branch in Denmark to market its Atragen and Astrafin products.

The success of MIP demonstrates South African technology companies' ability to develop world-class software from a South African cost and skills base.



Private equity as a funding alternative for private business
Rowan Williams, i capital fund managers (Pty) Ltd

Private equity has grown rapidly in South Africa over the last few years to become an important alternative source of funding for private businesses. Private equity funds play an important role in funding businesses as entrepreneurs and private business can gain access to capital without having to be exposed to the public scrutiny and volatility of stock markets, or to become heavily indebted and personally exposed to a bank. This allows the company to be properly capitalized and to flexibly execute its medium term strategy for growth.

Private equity plays another important role in funding private businesses by significantly increasing the chances of success for a growing business. A private equity fund manager will generally sift through over 50 investment opportunities before investing in one, ensuring that a full evaluation and due diligence is done on the investment, and the right opportunity is being backed. However, the fund managers' involvement does not end there as the fund manager takes an active role in managing the private equity investment, ensuring that the portfolio company continues to grow, is well managed and that corporate governance is adhered to. In this way, private equity funding is often a more appropriate equity funding mechanism for smaller companies than the public stock market or even debt finance. A study in the UK found that 40% of the companies that came to the London Stock Exchange had private equity funding. This demonstrates that private equity is to a much greater extent used as a source of capital prior to a company coming to the stock market via a listing. It is expected that this trend will occur in South Africa as private equity becomes a more recognized asset class and continues to be accepted as a funding mechanism for private business.

i capital, a Johannesburg based independent private equity fund manager, focuses on the value-added role of private equity capital and differentiates itself by being actively involved in managing its portfolio company investments. Says Rowan Williams, a director of i capital, "Entrepreneurial firms often grown very rapidly without putting the processes to continue to manage the business as it grows to the next level. We assist the companies our Fund invests in with specific value-added initiatives in the areas of strategic focus, operational efficiency, organisational design and financial structuring to ensure that the company can grow to the next level." i capital focuses on investments with a high level of intellectual capital content that have a sustainable competitive advantage. The company has had significant success in adding value to its portfolio of five investments and is actively negotiating a number of other investment opportunities.

Private equity will is increasingly playing a more important role in funding private businesses in South Africa. Says Williams; "entrepreneurs now have a viable alternative to funding their business, whilst at the same time gaining access to a committed partner and shareholder that is motivated to see the company succeed."


The state of the Investment Banking Market
Lance Williams, director, i capital advisers, 4 June 2001


Investment banks, both local and international, are reporting reduced profits and levels of activity. The first lay-offs have been announced in the large international investment banks. Even in South Africa, where skills are considered to be scarce, some of the marginal participants in the industry are withdrawing from the market, with a resultant effect of retrenching those staff employed in their investment banking divisions.

All of this is the effect of reduced activity in the market place. With the substantial correction in stock prices internationally, especially in the TMT (technology, media and telecom) sectors, equity capital markets are experiencing tougher times. Coupled with this phenomenon is the fact that most investment banks are reporting losses from their on-balance sheet investing activities. These have been caused by the downturn in stock prices. Investment banks are more circumspect when entering into new transactions, with an associated knock on effect on capital raising. Additionally volatile equity prices are causing divergent views on value making transactions more difficult to successfully complete.

All of these factors point to continued subdued and reduced activity in the market place. However some participants are viewing this in a positive light, with the elimination of the marginal participants from the industry that entered in the heady times, bringing a return to normality and a more stable market place which is positive in the long run.



Preparing for Capital Gains Tax
Lance Williams, director i capital advisers, 26 January 2001


Taxpayers, and specifically those taxpayers who hold stakes in unlisted companies, will need to consider carefully the valuation of the shares they hold in these unlisted companies on the implementation date for capital gains tax being 1 October 2001. There are three methods by which a taxpayer can value such an asset as at 1 October 2001. Each taxpayer should consider which method will optimise the taxpayers tax position.

The first alternative is to obtain a valuation of such an asset. If taxpayers opt for this route, the valuation must be lodged before 1 October 2003, i.e. within 2 years of the set implementation date for capital gains tax.

The second alternative is to use the 20% of proceeds valuation methodology. This method deems 20% of the proceeds of the sale of an asset to be the base cost of the asset sold after 1 October 2001 but purchased prior to this date. This method limits the maximum portion of a sale that can be considered as a capital gain to 80% of the proceeds.

The third option is the time-based apportionment method, whereby the time period the asset disposed of was held before and after the implementation date up to the disposal date is taken into account in determining the value of the asset as at 1 October 2001.



Challenges facing the Corporate and Merchant Banking Industry and the opportunities that arise out of these challenges
Lance Williams, director - i capital advisers, 27 May 2001


Participants in the corporate banking industry report a mixed outlook for the future of the industry in South Africa. With the reintegration of South Africa into global capital markets have come several challenges never seen before in the domestic market. Says Lance Williams, who is in charge of corporate finance at i capital, "these challenges have been felt in the South African market over the last few years, with some players adopting and thriving and others falling by the wayside."

Some of the changes and challenges that have influenced and continue to influence our markets have been as a result of internal structural change and some as a result of global reintegration and change. The most significant internal change has been to the South African competition legislation. South Africa and the participants in the mainstream economy experienced a shift from a benign Competition Law framework to an extremely robust framework. This shift has resulted in a lot of uncertainty in the market amongst corporates as a string of high profile transactions were blocked by the authorities in the year 2000. The resultant effect being that corporates are loathe to undertake certain transactions for fear them being rejected by the Competition authorities. This has had a significant effect on the level of domestic merger and acquisition activity. The competition authorities recently recognised some of the shortcomings in the legislation by increasing the thresholds for compulsory filing of transactions for clearance but the effect of the new legislation is still being felt in the market place.

"A direct influence of the reintegration of South Africa has been that of globalisation," says Williams. As barriers fall and borders become less and less relevant, South Africa is being exposed to competition globally. Two direct effects of this on merchant and investment banking have been the aggressive entrance of many foreign banks into South Africa and the advent of the offshore listing of some of South Africa's largest companies. Foreign investment banks account for, by far, the majority of the corporate advisory work by value and share of daily trade on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE).

Foreign listings of companies such as Anglo American, Old Mutual, SAB and Didata, have had the effect of moving much of these companies merger and acquisition activity offshore, reducing the size and volumes in South Africa. Recent surveys have unfortunately not reflected this phenomenon in their findings, provided a skewed picture of the volume of transactions actually happening in South Africa.

A further local change has been that to the JSE listing rules. The higher thresholds for listing and prohibition of listing of newly formed groups on the Main Board will affect the smaller players who concentrated on this business. Additionally the role of sponsors has been expanded and given higher levels of responsibility.

The global melt down in so called Technology-Media-Telecom (TMT) shares has negatively influenced share prices on the JSE. Generally depressed equity prices and so equity capital markets are negative for merger and acquisition activity. Depressed share prices will make it harder to do transactions in the future.

Thus where does this leave corporate and merchant banks operating in South Africa and what are the perceived opportunities in the local market. The large international and domestic investment banks are hoping to get a slice of the privatisation business that is still due to come. This is evidenced by the large number of bidders there were for the mandate to advise the government on the proposed listing of Telkom.

Certain niche markets also exist in the South African market place. One area that still is experiencing some activity is that of cross border transactions both in and out of South Africa. Large international companies still retain large interests in South Africa, with those players who haven't yet got a presence often looking to establish such a presence by means of acquiring a local company operating in their industry. Additionally with the gradual dismantling of exchange controls South African companies are also looking to establish a presence in foreign markets. Players how focus on these areas will be able to retain a good level of business into the future. "Thus those players who adapt best to the challenges faced by the market place will survive current market conditions and will hope to ride the next wave when it eventually comes round" says Williams. Submitted by: Lance Williams Director i capital A local corporate advisory and private equity fund management company.


Doing deals with the most chance of success
Lance Williams, director - i capital advisers, 13 May 2001


A lot has been written about the number and high percentage of transactions that don't produce value for the respective shareholders of the companies involved in the transaction. If this is the case then why do companies still undertake transactions on such a regular basis? It could be argued that companies undertaking transactions today are looking to obtain much more value than they did in the past out of these transactions. Whichever way you look at it, the market is skeptical about mergers and acquisitions, but is receptive to some deals more than to others.

Mergers and acquisitions should only be undertaken if they make sense, if they serve to further the strategic aims of the business. Looking back at past mergers and acquisitions, it is clear that some transactions serve some kind of strategies better than others.

Generally it is regarded that the market prefers transactions that are expansionist in nature, serving to boost the acquirers market share, adding new geographical regions to its sales or by adding more distribution channels for its products. Less favoured are transformative transactions which move companies into new lines of business or remove parts of the groups existing portfolio of business. However even within these two types of transactions, expansionist and transformative, the market appears to prefer one kind of transaction structure over another.

The market seems to prefer transactions structured as acquisitions rather than mergers or sales. The market also seems to not react as favourably to joint ventures and alliances as to acquisitions or mergers. It would appear that the markets preference of expansionist transactions is due to the perception that potential synergies from these deals are usually better because they bring similar assets together. Thus transformative deals most probably require more aggressive motivation and explanation to the market place as well as a higher degree to scrutiny to ensure that they succeed. Acquirers however do need to beware of what is known as "winner's curse", paying such a large premium to acquire outright control of a business, such that the potential benefits of the acquisition are overshadowed by this large premium.

The above market reaction to transactions is certainly not conclusive. There are many exceptions to the above. Many successful acquirers have followed the above, but have had to work hard at integrating even expansionist acquisitions. Management today need to scrutinise potential transactions even more rigoursly to be able to convince the market of the deals virtues and to ensure that the transaction will enhance the combined entities strategic goals and vision.



i capital Growth Fund I acquires 33% of Trispen Technologies (Pty) Ltd Sandton South Africa.
12 March 2001


The i capital Growth Fund I, a private equity fund managed and controlled by i capital (Pty) Ltd, has acquired 33% of Trispen Technologies (Pty) Ltd, a specialist developer and manufacturer of secure Virtual Private Networking (VPN) software and hardware based in Irene, Pretoria. The investment via a capital injection, effective 1 March 2001, will allow Trispen to further strengthen its position in the South African market for secure VPN products and spearhead the company's entry into the European market.

Trispen Technologies develops and manufactures products that enable the networked economy. Its IP-Granite product range allows corporations to use public networks such as the Internet securely by encrypting traffic flowing across the network. The products are often used between remote offices to build highly secure 'virtual' networks over the Internet, without resorting to dedicated networking infrastructure.

The IP-Granite product suite consists of software packages for workstations, servers and gateways, and a hardware device or "VPN Appliance" that provides a turnkey solution for securing traffic between network sites. To complement the product suite, Trispen recently introduced a sophisticated central policy manager. The Central manager uses a repository for managing networks consisting of up to a thousand VPN devices, and then publishes these policies to the individual devices.

Trispen markets the IP-Granite products through a partner channel. South African resellers of the IP_Granite range include security systems integrator Nanoteq and security solution provider Netcom Solutions. Trispen is also marketing the products in Germany through the Bristol Group, a specialist distributor of information security products.

i capital is a niche financial service company which focuses on private equity and corporate finance. Through its private equity fund, the i capital Growth Fund I, i capital provides growth capital to companies with a high intellectual capital component. Trispen Technologies is the fifth investment of the fund.

"Trispen has a focused strategy, world class products targeting a fast growing market, and a management and technical team experienced in the highly specialised field of network security" says Rowan Williams, director of i capital. " Trispen is currently supplying VPN gear for the largest IPSec-based VPN in South Africa and has established a solid foothold in this market. We believe that through our involvement Trispen's potential can be fully realised," Williams comments.

Rowan Williams will be joining the expanded Trispen board to assist with strategy and provide guidance on financial issues. "We are very excited to enter the next phase in Trispen's growth", says Jaco Botha, Managing Director of Trispen Technologies. "i capital brings a wealth of financial and strategic marketing knowledge, complementing our own product development capabilities. This combination is crucial if we are to succeed with our European expansion plans," Botha concludes.

More information about Trispen Technologies can be found on www.trispen.com, or by sending e-mail to info@trispen.com. Additional information about i capital is available on www.icapital.co.za or by e-mail from rowan.williams@icapital.co.za.



Recent changes to the Competition Act should impact positively on Merger and Acquisition activity in South Africa
Lance Williams, director, i capital advisers, 7 March 2001


The Minister of Trade and Industry recently announced amendments to the Competition Act that should impact positively on merger and acquisition activity in South Africa. It is widely accepted that the significantly revised Competition Legislation introduced in September 1999 has had a significant impact on merger and acquisition activity in South Africa with some high profile transactions being blocked by the Competition authorities. "The recent amendments to the Competition legislation are aimed at correcting various shortcomings that have emerged", says Lance Williams of i capital advisers, a niche corporate advisory company operating in Johannesburg.

The changes cover four main areas being: the jurisdiction of the Competition Act; structures, functions or powers of the Competition Commission, Competition Tribunal and Competition Appeal Court; procedures; and miscellaneous changes.

The changes to the procedures to the Act have an affect on advisors and companies undertaking transactions. "The amendments introduce a new category of 'small mergers', defined as transactions where the target firm, the firm being acquired, is less than R30 million in asset size or turnover or the combined target and acquiring firm has an asset value or turnover of less than R200 million," says Lance Williams.

The amendments give the Competition Commission the authority to review mergers below the minimum thresholds at any time within six months of the merger if it appears that the merger may substantially prevent or lessen competition or cannot be justified on public interest grounds. Whereas previously, if a merger fell below the minimum threshold merger notification was not required, on the basis of the amendments, the parties to a merger will now have to consider the risk of intervention by the Competition Commission. If the parties to a potential merger assess the risks of an anti-competitive result or a material negative impact on public interest as being high, then the amendments do provide for voluntarily notification of a small merger.

The increase of the thresholds is welcomed, as it will reduce the current requirement for notification of smaller mergers that would not have a significant impact on competition. This should hopefully reduce the volume of reviews undertaken by the Competition Commission, and resulting in improved response times to transactions submitted to the Competition Commission.

The timing of when the Competition Commission is required to respond to parties who have submitted a transaction has been amended. "These changes have created some misconception that the response times have been dramatically reduced" says Williams. "This is in fact not the case as the response times have merely been amended from days to business days." The number of days was reduced accordingly but has had a negligible effect on the response timing of the Competition Commission to those parties who have filed transactions for clearance.

Another significant change is the amendment to the filing fees. The filing fees, which previously ranged from R5 000 to R500 000, have been changed to a filing fee of R75 000 for all intermediate mergers (above R30 million in turnover or asset value or above a combined size of R200 million) and R250 000 for large mergers (above R100 million in turnover or asset value or above a combined size of R3.5 billion). This change should address the previous position whereby large companies acquiring any sized firm would almost always be subject to the maximum filing fee of R500 000 regardless of the size of the firm acquired.

"It is viewed that the recent amendments to the Competition Act should alleviate some of the regulations and costs faced with undertaking a transaction and assist in stimulating M&A activity in South Africa," concludes Lance Williams.


The role of private equity and LBO's in Merger and Acquisition activity
Lance Williams, director, i capital advisers, 7 March 2001

The South African stock market as a whole has generally been depressed for a sustained period of time with the boom times of the 1997 and the first half of 1998 having long been forgotten. The low equity ratings and resultant valuations coupled with the increased regulatory environment have had a negative effect on merger and acquisition activity in 2000 with the Johannesburg Securities Exchange shedding more than 30 listings in 2000. The medium and smaller sized listed entities no longer have highly valued and highly liquid paper with which to make acquisitions or raise capital to make acquisitions. Also the flat to negative share prices have put a halt to the high profile black empowerment transactions of the past which relied on special purpose vehicles and rising share prices.

As a result many listed companies have found themselves listed without the associated benefits of being a publicly listed company. Additionally listing to facilitate black empowerment transactions is also no longer viable or attractive. "This has seen a trend of public to private transactions, whereby listed companies are taken private, which is expected to increase" says Lance Williams of i capital advisers. "In many instances the cost of capital on the stock market has risen to such an extent that private equity or levered buy out capital is a lower cost source of capital." Additionally, when a company is unlisted it doesn't have the associated costs of supporting a listing, which can result in attractive cost savings when taking a business private. Recently the market has seen a number of public to private transactions with many more directors of listed companies considering this option.

Another benefit of private equity is the liquidity it creates for shareholders. More often than not the smaller to medium sized listed companies have experienced a dramatic reduction in the number of its shares traded. Shareholders with meaningful stakes who wish sell often find that there are little to no buyers. A delisting though a leveraged buy out or offer from a consortium involving a private equity funds allows these shareholders to dispose of their entire stakes in these businesses.

Leveraged finance is also starting to become an important part of black empowerment transactions, whereby leverage via debt is utilised to enable black management or entrepreneurs to obtain control of smaller to medium sized businesses. This model for black empowerment is arguably more sustainable than those models of the past, with the performance of the business and individuals in the business directly determining the wealth creation for the new shareholders. Several of these transactions have been successfully put together. As a result of the obstacles that many listed companies face and the benefits of a listing being questioned in a difficult economic environment, merger and acquisition activity in the area of private businesses is set to increase. There will be a greater balance of M&A activity occurring between the realm of private businesses and that of listed entities.

"A definite sign of this is the pick up i capital advisers has experienced in M&A activity occurring between unlisted entities, often with a cross border component to it", states Lance Williams. Companies prefer to undertake transactions without necessarily being listed. Companies that have either been delisted or are unlisted are still looking to grow by means of acquisition or by merger and are finding the valuations of their unlisted counterparts attractive enough to warrant this as viable option for growth.



The Importance of Post Deal Value Creation
Rowan Williams, director i capital fund managers, 11 February 2001


One of the most important areas of private equity finance is post deal value creation. This, indeed, is where the most value is generated. Post deal value creation is an area that Johannesburg-based private equity fund management firm i capital specializes in.

Established two years ago, it's 25% owned by the Liberty Group and its main principals are large insurance groups wishing to invest in private business in SA. The firm focuses largely on intellectual capital where assets are not necessarily reflected on the balance sheet, but are leveraged through the skills and resources of the businesses it invests in. i capital also has its own private equity fund, namely i capital Growth Fund I. Executive director, Rowan Williams, says, "We look to how we can create value with the portfolio company and how there can be interaction with the investee after the deal has taken place".

The post-deal value creation starts in the deal-making process, mainly the negotiations and the valuation of the business. It can be done in a number of ways, using a formal framework for analysis and understanding how value might be added. Issues that would typically be looked at include getting the strategic perspective right, understanding the marketplace, understanding the competitive environment and especially the competitive advantages, and the financial aspects. Important factors would also be the quality of management, financial controls, structuring the balance sheet, and using equity incentivisation.

Williams says, "We also look at the operations of the business, and this is all done through the due diligence process. We would, for example, look to eliminating unnecessary costs, the pricing of products and services, and the optimizing of these". Organizationally, he adds, a young entrepreneurial company often neglects to create formal organizational structures and formal communication lines. Outsiders can often better deal with this because they are not emotionally involved in the business. Important in achieving all this is having a good mix of skills in the private equity team. "In the past private equity players would mainly have had financial people - which is extremely important in the deal-making side of the business. However, increasingly there is a tendency towards a multi-disciplinary approach that would include management skills, business experience and technical expertise. The approach now is to be far more holistic.

"Sometimes in the bigger deals, due diligence teams will deploy both internal and external resources, for example bringing in additional marketing and organizational expertise. Areas of opportunity will be identified and the focus in the first six months is likely to be very intensive". Williams says i capital's experience is that this multi-disciplinary approach has been well accepted by management teams. It's clearly understood that the purpose is to take the business that has been invested in to a higher level, formalizing it, giving it greater capacity to grow, and all this without destroying the entrepreneurial spirit.


Perspective from a smaller player
Lance Williams, director i capital advisers, 26 January 2001

The investment banking sector has experienced a prolonged period of change and upheaval in the last few years, aggravated by the poor state of South Africa's capital markets. Additionally the regulatory environment in which investment bankers operate has changed significantly in the last few years and is set to experience further changes. "The general perception is thus that the environment for investment banking is poor", says Lance Williams a director of i capital. The question most on people's minds is how this has impacted on the players in the market place and how will these players continue to survive. The most likely to survive and prosper are those participants who deliver and maintain an uncompromising commitment to the highest level of advice and service.

It is recognised that the South African business landscape has become a lot tougher, having to stand up to international scrutiny and a host of new regulations getting South Africa in line with international norms and standards. The South African market experienced a proliferation of corporate advisory outfits and private equity investors in 1997 and 1998. This resulted in the market place becoming extremely crowded with many of the players chasing after the same business and investments. The changes outlined above have resulted in a substantial amount of fallout in the investment banking sector. Those players who are still in operation today have been able to either adapt to a new, harder environment or already offered a service that prepared them for a more difficult operating environment.

Most South African investment banks that started operations in the last few years have found it extremely difficult to break into the market and compete effectively with the established South African investment banks and larger international banks operating in South Africa. "What clients are looking for on the large transactions is an integrated service", says David Smollan a director of i capital. This means having an advisory capacity as well as a strong equity and capital market capacity to facilitate successful capital raising if necessary.

What has developed is a two-tier market, the top tier being serviced by the large international banks and established local investment banks. Niche players who have positioned themselves to offer quality advice and service on smaller transactions and can add value to the investments they make service the other tier. Those participants in between have suffered from the large overheads associated with operating an investment bank and have experienced sharp falls in profitability. The result has been a recent spate of consolidations, mergers and failures among local investment banks.

Thus in today's difficult environment the need exists more than ever to add value when advising on a transaction or making an investment. In order to compete effectively in your chosen market this means being able to provide for the needs of your clients. The top tier participants largely ignore smaller transactions. However an increased level of regulation has increased the required level of advice and standards that a corporate advisor needs to deliver when advising a corporate client on a transaction, large or small. On the investing side, there is a definite need to add demonstrable value to investments in which an investment bank or private equity investor may make from time to time, partly due to the reduced appetite for new listings on the JSE Securities Exchange. This has further been exacerbated by the recent changes in the listing rules of the JSE Securities Exchange.

"When we started i capital in October 1998, we positioned ourselves as a quality player offering the highest level of advice and service", says Lance Williams. This stance has enabled the company's two principal business lines, corporate advisory services and private equity fund management to grow steadily over the past 2 years, notwithstanding the slowdown in the areas in which it operates.

i capital has been able to capitalise on the current trends and market conditions and to develop a niche in the market place. The company's approach enables it to offer a higher level of expertise on smaller transactions involving larger companies who are familiar with obtaining a high level of service and expertise on the bigger transactions they undertake. i capital has also integrated a strategy discipline with corporate advisory and private equity investment skills to provide a holistic approach to the investment decision making progress. "This enables us to add value to all our private equity investments", says Rowan Williams, a director of i capital.

The directors of i capital are Lance Williams, Rowan Williams and David Smollan, who have all been with the group since its inception in late 1998.